As the big data industry is growing, the tools and techniques associated with it are also increasing. There are various tools that have made it easy for professionals to analyse big data. However, the question that often arises is which among these tools is better? The same goes for Apache Spark and Impala. This article will try to find which one is better – Apache Spark or Impala.
Big data is a revelation to the technology industry and has changed the way data has been usually conceived. Businesses have discovered its potential and adopted for creating value in terms of better product or service delivery, better customer interactions and better market understanding. If you are looking to be a part of this lucrative industry, get started with a big data certification course.
Apache Spark and Impala are two of the commonly-used tools in big data and there is an ongoing debate among the professionals who are divided on which one is better. Before we differentiate the two, let us find out a bit about them.
Let’s jump in:
Apache Spark is a fast and general engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing. It was originally developed at the AMPLab of the University of California in Berkley, and was later donated to Apache Software Foundation, which now maintains it. It’s written in Scala, Java, Python, and R; and works on most of the major OS, viz. Microsoft Windows, MacOS and Linux.
Also Read>> How to crack a Spark Interview?
Impala is an open-source massively parallel processing (MPP) SQL query engine for data stored in a computer cluster running Apache Hadoop. It was developed by Cloudera and works in a cross-platform environment. The project was announced in 2012 and is inspired from the open-source equivalent of Google F1.
There have been a lot of questions whether Apache Spark is better than Impala or if it’s the other way round. Let us see some of the comparisons to find out:
The popularity of a tool is important as no one would want to learn something that nobody in the industry uses. According to DB-engines ranking , Impala has a score of 12.79 with an overall rank of 31 and Spark has a score of 10.50 with an overall rank of 37. Though, they are not that apart, there is a difference in the popularity rankings which might give Impala an advantage.
The Score: Impala 1: Spark 0
Spark can run both short and long-running queries and recover from mid-query faults, while Impala is more focussed on the short queries and is not fault-tolerant.
The score: Impala 1: Spark 1
Impala is used for Business Intelligence (BI) projects because of the low latency that it provides. The reporting is done through some front-end tool like Tableau, and Pentaho. Spark can be used for analytics purposes where the professionals are inclined towards statistics as they can use R for designing the initial frames.
The Score: Impala 1: Spark 1
According to multi-user performance testing, it is seen that Impala has shown a performance that is 7 times faster than Apache Spark.
The Score: Impala 2: Spark 1
Apache Spark supports Hive UDFs (user-defined functions). However, Impala, because of it uses a custom C++ runtime, does not support Hive UDFs.
The Score: Impala 2: Spark 2
Impala has a query throughput rate that is 7 times faster than Apache Spark.
The Score: Impala 3: Spark 2
Though the above comparison puts Impala slightly above Spark in terms of performance, both do well in their respective areas. While Impala leads in BI-type queries, Spark performs extremely well in large analytical queries. So, it would be safe to say that Impala is not going to replace Spark soon or vice versa.